← back to home

Vote on AI

Your move

Make sure you’re registered, then check where your candidates stand on AI before November 3.

Check your registration See your exact ballot

Updated Oct. 27 · Election Day is Tue, Nov. 3 · Early voting is underway in many states, and rules differ, so check yours at vote.gov. [135]

This page only looks at where candidates stand on AI. It won’t tell you who to vote for.

What’s on the ballot November 3

Nationwide

  • All 435 U.S. House seats [141]
  • 35 U.S. Senate seats and 36 governors [239]
  • State legislature seats in 46 states [144]
  • 145 statewide ballot measures in 39 states, none of them about AI [240]
  • Dozens of local votes on data centers [145]
Why the fight over state vs. national AI rules matters →

Your ballot is much shorter. You only vote on races where you live. Pick your state above to see what’s on it.

How candidates are sorted

When you pick your state, you’ll see candidates we’ve identified with documented AI positions or relevant outside spending. A candidate is only listed if there’s proof we can link to:

  • Their own words or record on AI. This counts the most.
  • AI money spent for or against them, from federal election filings, collected by Transformer’s AI Campaign Finance Tracker. [22]

Party plays no part in who’s listed. Who shows up comes only from that data and from candidates’ own AI records, so the mix of parties changes when the tracker updates.

There are two sides of AI money. AI industry money comes from the Leading the Future network (Think Big, American Mission, Building the Future), funded by people like OpenAI president Greg Brockman and the investment firm Andreessen Horowitz. It pushes for one national rulebook instead of state AI laws. [120] [96] Safeguards money comes mostly from the Public First network (Jobs and Democracy, Defending Our Values), plus Guardrails Alliance, You Can Push Back and Tomorrow Together. Its funders include the AI company Anthropic. It backs candidates who support AI safety rules for kids, workers and the public. [241] “Safeguards money” and “AI industry money” are this site’s plain names for what the tracker calls “pro-safety” and “pro-innovation” groups. That’s our frame of reference: we only look at AI, not anything else a candidate stands for.

It’s not just one company asking for rules

In October 2025, a long list of well known people signed a statement asking for a ban on building AI smarter than humans until scientists agree it can be done safely and the public is on board. They included AI pioneers Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio, UC Berkeley’s Stuart Russell, Apple cofounder Steve Wozniak, actors Stephen Fry and Joseph Gordon-Levitt, musician will.i.am, Richard Branson, Prince Harry and Meghan, former top U.S. military officer Mike Mullen, former Obama adviser Susan Rice, and well known conservative voices too. [242] [243]

Candidates with documented words or a record get a position label, shown by shape: ● Leans toward AI safeguards, ◐ Mixed, or ○ Leans toward fewer AI rules. Outside spending appears in separate tags and does not determine a position label. Candidates without documented words or a record have no position label.

Spending tags get a dot too, so you can see at a glance which side the money is on: ● safeguards money backing them, ○ AI industry money backing them or safeguards money against them. That shows who is betting on them, not what they believe.

The fine print
  • Outside spending shows which groups support or oppose a candidate. It is not necessarily a donation to the candidate and does not prove what they believe. Position labels use only the candidate’s documented words or record.
  • Spending totals come from the Transformer tracker, checked October 27, 2026. They only count money reported to federal regulators.
  • Candidates who lost their primary are left out. Every listed candidate has been checked against primary results.
  • This covers U.S. Senate, U.S. House and governor races. If a candidate isn’t listed, it means we found no clear public record, not that they have no view. Ask them.

See something wrong or missing? Email hey@commonlifeproject.com and I’ll fix it.

Questions to ask any candidate

Will you support outside safety testing before powerful AI is released?
Should a government watchdog be able to stop an unsafe AI system?
Will you ban AI tools that make fake nude images of real people?
What will you do for workers whose jobs are cut because of AI?
Do you take campaign money from the AI industry?

Ask at town halls, by email, or on their social posts. A vague answer is an answer too.

Don’t skip the small races

A lot of AI law is being made by states, not just Congress. And many towns are voting on data centers, which use a lot of local power and water. Your local ballot matters.

Some places are still collecting signatures to put data centers to a vote, like Weld County, Colorado. [244] Ohio lists every petition circulating in the state. [245] Signing one is a five minute step.

Data center measures on 2026 ballots Six states voting on data centers in November Boulder City, NV data center vote Weld County, CO data center petition Ohio data center ban amendment Conserve Ohio petition Frederick County, MD referendum ruling Can your state vote on its own measures?
Can’t wait for election day? Contact your reps →